On September 13, 2023, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the launch of an anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric vehicles. Notably, this is the first global anti-subsidy investigation targeting Chinas automotive industry. It resembles a storm, especially for Chinese EV manufacturers.

What exactly is this so-called "game"?

For the EU, anti-subsidy investigations are not a new "game." However, for China's automotive industry, this presents a fresh challenge. Previously, the EU has initiated multiple trade remedy investigations against China, but these primarily targeted traditional manufacturing sectors such as steel, textiles, and furniture. This time, the focus has shifted directly to the automotive industry, striking an unexpected "edge ball."

What are the EUs anti-subsidy investigation rules?

The European Union has a specific set of anti-subsidy investigation rules, the essence of which is: if products from a certain country receive subsidies, and these subsidies cause harm to the EU's domestic industries, then the EU has the right to investigate and may impose countervailing duties. It sounds like an advanced "tabletop game," with strategies and rules so numerous they can be dizzying. But in reality, it's a form of "protectionism." Don't worry, let's break down these rules step by step.

(1) What is an anti-subsidy investigation?

First, we need to clarify that anti-subsidy investigations are conducted by the EU on certain products from non-EU countries. Their purpose is to determine whether these products have received subsidies from the exporting country and whether such subsidies have caused damage to the EUs domestic industry.

(2) Legal basis: EU Anti-Subsidy Regulation

The EU's countervailing investigation is conducted based on the "Regulation on Protection Against Subsidized Imports from Countries Not Members of the European Union" (also known as the "EU Countervailing Regulation"). The fundamental principles of this regulation originate from the WTO "Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures" (referred to as the "SCM Agreement").

(3) Who is the "referee" in the investigation?

The competent authority for conducting anti-subsidy investigations is the European Commission. But when it comes to final decision-making, it depends on the stance of the EU Council of Ministers.

(4) How to determine the existence of subsidies?

The definition of subsidies is broad, encompassing any form of financial contribution provided by the government or public bodies of the exporting country. This includes, but is not limited to, low-interest loans, electricity subsidies, tax incentives, etc. The key here is that these contributions must provide actual benefits to the recipients.

(5) Specificity of subsidies: De jure specificity and de facto specificity

Only specific subsidies are considered problematic. Specificity here includes two aspects: de jure specificity and de facto specificity based on actual operations. For example, if a subsidy is only available to a specific industry or region, this is de jure specificity. De facto specificity is more complex and requires judgment based on specific cases.

(6) How to determine whether damage has been caused?

Determining whether damage has been caused is a complex process that requires a comprehensive assessment from multiple aspects, including the existence of subsidies, the specificity of subsidies, and whether the EU industry has suffered material damage.

(7) EU interest test

Finally, there is one very important step, which is the "EU interest test." This is to ensure that even if subsidies are confirmed to exist and have caused harm, the EU must also guarantee that imposing countervailing duties will not harm the overall economic and industrial interests of the EU.

Procedurally, EU anti-subsidy investigations specify a particular investigation period, which is clearly stated in the initiation notice. Typically, the investigation period is one year. Once the investigation begins, the main key timelines are as follows:

How to deal with this "storm"?

Assess existing business and product conditions, actively respond to litigation

If named in the investigation, the best approach is to actively respond and provide truthful, complete documentation to prove your innocence.

Coordinate among enterprises and cooperate fully

In this "battle," unity is strength. All enterprises should coordinate with each other and respond collectively.

Select a professional team to handle the investigation

Since it is a "battle," a strong "army" is necessary. Selecting a professional team is the key to handling investigations.

Adjust future business plans based on the ruling results

Regardless of the investigations outcome, future business plans must be adjusted to ensure the steady development of the enterprise.